Skip to main content

Instinct - review


Dr. Dylan Reinhart is a former CIA operative who retired and put himself to academic pasture when he fell in love and got married. When a serial killer takes inspiration from his book on abnormal behaviour, he finds himself back in the field; this time with paired with Elizabeth Needham, an NYPD detective who finds it difficult to collaborate since the death of her partner cum fiancé. 

Reinhart enjoys the experience and becomes a consultant for the NYPD, working with Needham, and we are off for 24 episodes (two series) of police procedural with a psychopathic twist. I'm only three episodes in of Instinct, but the emerging pattern seems to be that the perp appears early on as a very minor character, and you can spot them a mile off. So far, so formulaic. 

What is less formulaic is that Reinhart and Needham like each other pretty much from the get go, when we are usually presented with a sometimes tedious game of the odd couple begrudgingly learning to respect and like each other. This make for a nice change and a much lighter vibe for the show. 

The biggest break of the mould, however, is in the fact that Reinhart, the main, main character, is an openly gay man. A married gay man. This leads to scene like the one at the end of episode three, where the victorious Reinhart and his husband kiss and walk off in the metaphorical sunset, holding hands. 

At no point is the Reinhart sexuality questioned. It is "normal" from the start (apart from a gently jokey moment when Needham is about to be first introduced to Andy, the husband, who she assumes to be a woman). 

When I saw the end scene I described above it hit me how subversive this all-in-all middling, slightly camp show, is in fact subversive. This is a show made by CBS, shown on Channel 5. It was made for the general public, not the gay audience. The gay man is the male lead, the very intelligent, action hero bringer of justice (there are limited fight scenes). He is not a secondary character with no life that serves as a plot device, as queer people usually are in mainstream productions. 

 I don't think there is an equivalent to that level of representation.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Short History of the Elephant and Castle and Its Name

Last night I attended a lecture by local historian Stephen Humphrey who discussed the general history of the Elephant & Castle, focussing more particularly on what he called its heyday (between 1850 and 1940). This is part of a week-long art project ( The Elephant Project ) hosted in an empty unit on the first floor of the infamous shopping centre, aiming to chart some of the changes currently happening to the area. When an historian starts talking about the Elephant and Castle, there is one subject he can not possibly avoid, even if he wanted to. Indeed my unsuspecting announcement on Facebook that I was attending such talk prompted a few people to ask the dreaded question: Where does the name of the area come from, for realz? Panoramic view of the Elephant and Castle around 1960/61. Those of us less badly informed than the rest have long discarded the theory that the name comes from the linguistic deformation of "Infanta de Castille", a name which would have become at...

Welcome to Towleroad Readers

On Wednesday, Towleroad , the top gay blog, who win all the awards, were kind enough to link to and quote from my post on Football and Homophobia . This has generated quite a bit a traffic in this otherwise desolate region of the blogosphere. So much so that Wednesday was my highest day ever with 132 hits (previous one was 97), this week is already my highest ever with 317 hits so far (previous one was 287) and this month is the highest month ever with already 865 hits (previous one, last month, was 739, thanks to the posts on the Danish cartoons). So thank you again to Towleroad and welcome to their readers. I hope they like what they see and will be back from time to time.

For the Living Left Behind - Frieda Hughes

No one dead who loved you  Would wish your future years dismembered  Against the rocks of their departure.  They would not sentence you to the guilt of betrayal  For any moment they weren’t uppermost in your mind  Nor would they wish you whittled down like a stick  To pick the stony teeth in the open mouth of abject misery,  Daily, until you are nothing left.  No one dead who loved you  Would want your still-breathing carcass  To be lost in the wilderness  That spans the two worlds of the living and the dead,  Where you are neither dead nor living.  They would not applaud your misery,  But would weep to watch their loss  Made pointless by the waste of you.  The dead become a part of us; our skin, our bones, our thinking;  Their existence is continuous in us  And the best we do in everything  As we move on from the moment of their passing.  Step back from the graveside where nothing flower...