Skip to main content

Sexual Orientation Regulations - The Demo

I am still a little cold almost an hour after I got home. But looking back and having listen to the news, it was all worth it.

The World Tonight on Radio4 have just reported that after 3 hours of debate which were unusually well attended, the challenge to the new regulation lost the day by a majority of 131. 68 Lords supporting Lord Morrow's motion to annul the regulations.

Crowds singing

Outside of the House of Lords where I found myself tonight, there were "hundreds of people" (again according to the BBC but I would say about 2000) demonstrating in support of the motion. Of those, there were about 100 gay and lesbian people in total who had come spontaneously to show their disagreement. Linda Bellos, Ben Summerskill and other Stonewall people, someone from Outrage! and gay Christians were in attendance too.

Considering the amount of free publicity achieved by the event in the media today (and that included the unusual inclusion by BBC News of all the details of location and times on its website), I don't think the turn out can have be deemed much of a success by the organisers.

This was supposed to be a multi-faith affair but it was overwhelmingly led by “Christians” and had a distinct evangelical flavour (about half of the attendance was black). People singing and brandishing placards (reading "Cry Freedom", "Christians Awake" or "Back the Bible"), applauding speakers (including Rev. George Hargreaves, who in a past life wrote the very gay song “Not So Macho”, in a Guantanamo style boiler suit!). Non-Christian demonstrators can’t have felt very welcome and included.

The (mostly) Christian demonstrators

Children had of course been drafted and brought to the fore. The old confused spectre of the paedophile always at easy and comforting reach. Some Christians managed to tear themselves from the chanting crowd to come and chat with us who were standing silently on the side. Lively but mostly good mannered debates ensued. There were unfortunately a few shouts and rude words from a couple of gay guys during a heat aside with a Christian woman.

I found myself talking shortly to a born again man who seemed fairly reasonable I had a longer conversation with Amanda, a thin blond woman in her early forties. She seemed nice enough but, together with her elderly friend had this particular brand of religious zeal that make people seem a little deranged. The fact that the older woman kept repeating that god had created me and loved me did help.

As was made clear in the protracted debate on the regulations, there is a lot of misinformation and confusion on the Christian side. Amanda and her friend didn't know about the Christian Institute which is at the forefront of the opposition to the regulations; neither did they know about their inflammatory advert in the Times some weeks ago. Amanda finally told me that she was there because she fears that her freedom of speech will be taken away from her. She seemed to have only a hazy idea of the regulations but when I told her that she would still be able to SAY what she wants, she did not want to believe me.

In the end the argument from the people I met is that homosexuality, in their view (supported by the Bible which in turn is the word of god) is a sin. They see the law as forcing them to be unchristian by allowing something they disagree with.
This is compounded by the fact that sex should for them only take place within the holy bonds of matrimony and there you go: you can’t have two gays in one Christian B&B room (which seems to be the main contention here)… They all said they would also ban adulterers if they knew about them.

There doesn’t seem to be any rational basis to their point of view, which means you can’t really argue with them or hope to get them to see the light (so to speak).
Rainbow

On the whole, as could have been expected, no one was convinced by the other side's argument. I want to hope, however that I (and other elements of a discussion he was taking part in) gave something to think about to (rather handsome) black man. He first seemed to consider homosexuality as a choice but when I asked him if he could bring himself to desire a man, he became silent. Later, he asked us gays how we had known we were gay. Again our answer seemed to make him pose for thought.

Slowly around 8pm, the demonstration slowly disbanded allowing people to rejoin the coaches they had been shipped on. As I was getting ready to leave myself, someone I know told me how on arriving he had heard a woman on the other side of the road saying to her companion that she was a member of the House and, on seeing the signs marked "freedom" in the crowd, that those must be a counter demonstration. Quite ironic really.

Interviewed by Gaydar Radio

A slightly different version of this post was publish on PinkNews.co.uk on 10 January 2007, with the header: It was not just protesters out last night in Parliament Square. Blogger Nicholas Chinardet went along to meet the enemy, and was surprised to find some of them confused about the actual nature of the Sexual Orientation Regulations. Here is his account of events outside the House of Lords last night.

Further reading:
* Another account of the demo, with (better) pictures.
* Discrimination law controversy By Jon Silverman, BBC Legal affairs analyst

Previous Posts:
* Anti-Freedom Demo Today Outside Parliament
* Sexual Orientation Regulations, Letter To Ruth Kelly
* Sexual Orientation Regulations, The Saga Continues
* Anti-Gay Christians Strike Again - Part 2
* Anti-Gay Christians Strike Again


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .

Comments

  1. Thanks for this post and the pictures especially.

    A great day for democracy (even if the Lords aren't elected).

    A bad day for religious bigots who have a lot of thinking to do.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, Da, it was actually good fun :O)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Please leave your comment here. Note that comments are moderated and only those in French or in English will be published. Thank you for taking the time to read this blog and to leave a thought.

Popular posts from this blog

A Short History of the Elephant and Castle and Its Name

Last night I attended a lecture by local historian Stephen Humphrey who discussed the general history of the Elephant & Castle, focussing more particularly on what he called its heyday (between 1850 and 1940). This is part of a week-long art project ( The Elephant Project ) hosted in an empty unit on the first floor of the infamous shopping centre, aiming to chart some of the changes currently happening to the area. When an historian starts talking about the Elephant and Castle, there is one subject he can not possibly avoid, even if he wanted to. Indeed my unsuspecting announcement on Facebook that I was attending such talk prompted a few people to ask the dreaded question: Where does the name of the area come from, for realz? Panoramic view of the Elephant and Castle around 1960/61. Those of us less badly informed than the rest have long discarded the theory that the name comes from the linguistic deformation of "Infanta de Castille", a name which would have become at

Rev. Peter Mullen's Blog

Rev. Peter Mullen is the chaplain to the London Stock Exchange and the rector of St Michael's Cornhill and St Sepulchre without Newgate in the City. Rev. Peter Mullen was also until recently a blogger. Sadly the result of his cyber labour seem to have been deleted but Google has thankfully cached some of it and I have saved a copy for posterity, just in case. The deletion of Rev. Mullen's writings might just have something to do with the fact that last week, the Evening Standard and then the Daily Mail published an article (the same article actually) about some of those very writings (even though the elements of said writings being quoted had been published in June this year, at the time of the blessing ceremony which took place between two members of the Church of England in St Bartholomew the Great - picture ). In the article, we learned what the Rev. thinks about gay people and what should be done to them: We ["Religious believers"] disapprove of homosexuality

Liam Messam and Tamati Ellison Swap Jerseys

I am having a bit of a vacuous evening looking at images of pretty rugby players. Addidas, with its latest viral campaign, Jersey Swap , seems to be squarely aiming at the gay market with a selection of five antipodean rugby players, visitor to the website can select and see take their tops off and... well... swap jersey (those interested can create posters too). My favorites of the bunch are Liam Messam and Tamati Ellison . The pictures of their pretty faces and bulging naked torsos (excuse me while I sit down for a second!) included to this post should tell you why. A job well done for Addidas. This will go round the Internet for a while, I think.