Skip to main content

More On the Cartoons Crisis

Page three of Jyllands-Posten's culture section - 30 September 2005
As the madness continues to spiral out of proportion (the Danish embassy in Beirut was burnt down on Sunday,two people got killed in Afghanistan while protesters in the UK called for the beheading of whoever they thought were responsible), I heard, yesterday morning on the Today Programme, the leader of al-Muhajiroun, Omar Bakri Mohamed, and the Secretary General of the Arab League, Amr Moussa, both making the point that while there are laws in many (western) countries to forbid anti-Semitic discourses, there is nothing to prevent anti-Muslim attacks.

I don’t think this is a relevant argument in this debate to be honest and these people are simply clutching at straws to try and justify their messages of hatred. It seems to me that anti-Semitism and what the media like to call Islamophobia are two completely different situations, which are not comparable. Each feeling has quite different ways of expressing itself. While one is verbal and not actually violent but simply critical (although the response to it is violent), the other has been expressed through unqualified levels of violence. Arguably the Israeli state is not always behaving as well as one could expect from a nation that knows from its own history the potential results of some of it policies but this same history is also the proof of the undeserved level of suffering that can be inflicted on the Jewish people. Conversely, so-called Islamophobia is often the exacerbated result of a fear stirred up by the actions of a minority of Muslims (fundamentalists and terrorists) magnified by media coverage. However I don't think there is anywhere an ideology preaching a systematic destruction of all the Muslims.

Muslims tend to want to identify as being some sort of united people, grouping themselves within the Ummah, often putting their religious allegiance before any national sense of belonging. I don’t think this is a true representation of the Muslim phenomenon, as it is clear that there are many divergent groups within the Muslim faith. However, the price of this self-identification, which in many respect would mirror that of the Jews as a race more than a religious group, might be to become the focal point of more attacks, and violent ones at that, in the manner experienced by the Jews for centuries.

Most of the cartoons were however pretty innocuous and rather mediocre to be honest. Only one (on the right) could really be seen as offensive. This cartoon is so grossly biased (in that it supports the amalgam that all Muslims (symbolised here by their prophet) are terrorists) that it doesn’t deserve to be dignified by a comment, let alone the violent reactions we have seen in the past few days. As I have mention before, these reactions do nothing to dispel the bad image of the Muslims.

Of course, something no-one seems to be ready to mention in this business, is that Arabic newspapers have notoriously been running a virulent cartoons campaign against Israel for many years. Those cartoons are much more vicious, I think, than the ones that sparked the recent violence; still, no one bats an eyelid.

I mentioned in my previous post on the subject that I believed that the protests were politically motivated and organised by small militant groups. It is interesting to note that in the pictures of the London demonstrations on the BBC News website, the signs held by protestors are quite visibly of the same make and show the same handwriting. Nothing spontaneous about this, I think. I find the slogan "Freedom go to hell" truely shocking. If this young man does not approve of freedom, what is he doing in this country using the very freedom given to him by its laws and society? Shouln't he try and move to a more repressive country?

In any case, the fact that one of the protestors dressed up as a suicide bomber and was a drug dealer says a lot. It also seems that it is fine and enough for him to apologise for his mistake while the newspapers are not so lucky.

Again, while I can understand that people feel offended, I can not understand why they are so violent in their reactions which seem so completely out of proportion to the offence.

Read my previous post on the subject.



Tags: , , , , , , , , , .

Comments

  1. The Muslim blogger "Iraq The Model" writes:

    "You know that those cartoons were published for the 1st time months ago and we here in the Middle East have tonnes of jokes about Allah, the prophets and the angels that are way more offensive, funny and obscene than those poorly-made cartoons, yet no one ever got shot for telling one of those jokes or at least we had never seen rallies and protests against those infidel joke-tellers.

    "What I want to say is that I think the reactions were planned to be exaggerated this time by some Middle Eastern regimes and are not mere public reaction.
    And I think Syria and Iran have the motives to trigger such reactions in order to get away from the pressures applied by the international community on those regimes."

    Read the rest here:
    http://iraqthemodel.blogspot.com/2006/02/time-for-cartoon-post.html

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with you that this is so stupid all of this rage they are showing in the Middle East. I can also understand that they feel offended but they are acting like LITTLE IMMATURE BRATS!(6 years old kids or something!!) And they don't even use their actions towards the ones that really are responsible! How immature is that! It was NOT The government that published the pictures and still they attack government buildings and they make threats to Danish citizens! do they not know how to count over there? The pictures were 12, the news paper was one, how do they add that up to a guilty WHOLE nation????

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Please leave your comment here. Note that comments are moderated and only those in French or in English will be published. Thank you for taking the time to read this blog and to leave a thought.

Popular posts from this blog

A Short History of the Elephant and Castle and Its Name

Last night I attended a lecture by local historian Stephen Humphrey who discussed the general history of the Elephant & Castle, focussing more particularly on what he called its heyday (between 1850 and 1940). This is part of a week-long art project ( The Elephant Project ) hosted in an empty unit on the first floor of the infamous shopping centre, aiming to chart some of the changes currently happening to the area. When an historian starts talking about the Elephant and Castle, there is one subject he can not possibly avoid, even if he wanted to. Indeed my unsuspecting announcement on Facebook that I was attending such talk prompted a few people to ask the dreaded question: Where does the name of the area come from, for realz? Panoramic view of the Elephant and Castle around 1960/61. Those of us less badly informed than the rest have long discarded the theory that the name comes from the linguistic deformation of "Infanta de Castille", a name which would have become at

Rev. Peter Mullen's Blog

Rev. Peter Mullen is the chaplain to the London Stock Exchange and the rector of St Michael's Cornhill and St Sepulchre without Newgate in the City. Rev. Peter Mullen was also until recently a blogger. Sadly the result of his cyber labour seem to have been deleted but Google has thankfully cached some of it and I have saved a copy for posterity, just in case. The deletion of Rev. Mullen's writings might just have something to do with the fact that last week, the Evening Standard and then the Daily Mail published an article (the same article actually) about some of those very writings (even though the elements of said writings being quoted had been published in June this year, at the time of the blessing ceremony which took place between two members of the Church of England in St Bartholomew the Great - picture ). In the article, we learned what the Rev. thinks about gay people and what should be done to them: We ["Religious believers"] disapprove of homosexuality

Liam Messam and Tamati Ellison Swap Jerseys

I am having a bit of a vacuous evening looking at images of pretty rugby players. Addidas, with its latest viral campaign, Jersey Swap , seems to be squarely aiming at the gay market with a selection of five antipodean rugby players, visitor to the website can select and see take their tops off and... well... swap jersey (those interested can create posters too). My favorites of the bunch are Liam Messam and Tamati Ellison . The pictures of their pretty faces and bulging naked torsos (excuse me while I sit down for a second!) included to this post should tell you why. A job well done for Addidas. This will go round the Internet for a while, I think.